The Model Context Protocol provides a shared interaction substrate for the agentic web, allowing heterogeneous services to expose capabilities through a standardized interface. Learning to use this ecosystem entails a hierarchy of capabilities: tool-format skills, server-level transfer, and cross-server composition. We present MCPDisCo, an ecosystem-scale reinforcement learning framework for MCP-native agents. Using a Thought-Markov Decision Process (Thought-MDP), the framework explicitly represents internal reasoning alongside routing, execution, and termination and trains on real-server, long-horizon interactions spanning 70 MCP servers and 527 tools across six domains. We study the reasoning--tool seesaw, a joint-learning failure mode in which improvement in one objective can accompany deterioration in the other. To mitigate potential interference, MCPDisCo combines token-masked reward attribution with bidirectional gradient surgery: the former separates direct supervision for reasoning and action spans, while the latter removes conflicting components from both objective gradients in shared parameters. MCPDisCo achieves higher success with fewer chain-of-thought tokens. On the out-of-distribution MCP-Atlas and the GAIA benchmark, MCPDisCo maintains monotone gains, confirming that the learned behavior generalizes beyond the training server distribution and broader agentic tasks. Model weight and implementation are available.
Chain-of-thought prompting enables reasoning in large language models but produces explanations that are difficult to verify, expensive to generate, and not always faithful. We introduce a Structural Chain-of-Thought framework where models generate executable computational graphs instead of free-form reasoning. The final answer is obtained by deterministically executing the graph. The model is trained using graph-based reinforcement learning that rewards structural validity, answer correctness, and node overlap with reference graphs. Experiments across five benchmarks and four model families show that our method consistently improves accuracy over supervised graph training and can reduce generation length by up to 5-6x compared with standard GRPO and chain-of-thought supervised training. Our faithfulness experiments reveal that models trained with our approach tend to rely on deriving their answers from the generated graphs rather than producing post-hoc rationalizations as usually in chain-of-thought reasoning.
When solving complex spatial reasoning tasks, ordinary humans naturally revisit the scenes from task-relevant viewpoints and mentally reconstruct the spatial layouts from those viewpoints. But can Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) proactively think in the same way? We term this ability Active Spatial Mentalization (ASM), an intrinsic component of visual intelligence that remains substantially underdeveloped in current LVLMs. To bridge this gap, we introduce SpatialASM, a scalable framework to internalize ASM into LVLMs through training-time spatial simulation. SpatialASM employs an allocentric novel-view generator to ground hypothetical viewpoints in visual evidence and produces two complementary forms of supervision: i) explicit ASM trajectories that teach LVLMs when and how to adaptively invoke view planning and imagination during spatial reasoning, and ii) automatically-constructed perspective-taking tasks that further strengthens viewpoint-conditioned scene imagination. On seven benchmarks spanning relatively perception-oriented spatial understanding to more challenging tasks requiring multi-image, cross-view and viewpoint-transformation reasoning, SpatialASM yields performance gain on LVLMs of four LVLM backbones in spatial reasoning while retaining their original general vision capabilities. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach improves average accuracy across the seven spatial benchmarks. And the synthesis of ASM trajectories provides a scalable pathway to alleviate the scarcity of spatial Chain-of-Thought (CoT) supervision for eliciting active viewpoint exploration and mental scene simulation.
语言模型越来越多地被用于辅助或自动执行信息检索，从规模过大、难以建立索引的文档集合中查找信息。当这项任务需要专业的语言学或科学知识时，就会变得困难。我们使用 Wikipedia Game，在一项类似的信息检索任务中测试语言模型。在该游戏中，玩家必须仅通过文章链接到达目标文章。我们在五种语言的 Wikipedia 和五个学术文献数据集上，对句子嵌入模型和大语言模型（LLM）进行了比较。我们构建了超大规模的 Wikipedia 页面本地图结构，并利用 OpenAlex 构建了论文引用本地图结构，同时提供了构建和导航这些图结构的代码。这使得研究者无需依赖第三方 API，即可研究语言模型的导航能力。我们将这些模型与人类和 TF-IDF 基准进行了比较。Wikipedia Game 的形式支持跨技术、语言和领域的稳健比较。没有任何模型显著优于人类，但表现最好的模型（GPT-o3 mini、GPT-4o、QwQ:32B 和 DeepSeek-R1:70B）取得了与人类相当的成功率。模型的表现和排名随语言和主题而变化，这对采用这些技术的实践者具有参考意义。
arXiv:2610.11366v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spatial coding agents significantly improve spatial reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) by using external tools to generate verified execution traces. However, this paradigm inherently suffers from prohibitive inference-time overhead and external dependencies. In this paper, we explore whether an MLLM can internalize this agentic capability to operate entirely tool-free. We begin with a simple observation: prompting an MLLM with summarized execution traces of a spatial coding agent naturally unlocks the model's internal spatial Chain-of-Thought (CoT). Motivated by this, we introduce SpatialOPSD, an on-policy self-distillation framework that internalizes spatial reasoning into a standalone MLLM by formulating verified agent traces as privileged information. To mitigate privileged-information leakage during distillation, we introduce Repetition-Aware Distillation, which combines repetition masking with unlikelihood regularization. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that self-distilling SpatialOPSD achieves higher average accuracy than SFT and GRPO on both spatial and OOD datasets, exhibiting superior performance and generalization.
arXiv:2610.10854v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge distillation is an established technique for improving the capabilities of small, efficient student models by training them with the representations of larger, more capable teacher models. Much of the recent work in the distillation of large language models (LLMs) has focused on distilling abilities learned during post-training, such as instruction following, chain-of-thought reasoning, and tool usage. This has left a large research gap in general knowledge distillation for LLMs, which is essential for developing efficient and private systems suitable for deployment on edge devices. We take a first-principles approach, evaluating previous lessons from prior works and conducting new explorations to develop a distillation methodology suitable for modern LLMs. We present KDFP, a novel methodology for white-box general knowledge distillation in LLMs. We demonstrate that KDFP outperforms existing methods by 1.6% $-$ 4.9% across 9 benchmarks while increasing training efficiency by up to 99.1% through ephemeral parameter reduction.
Radical Numerics is using biological chain-of-thought and multimodal perception to keep up with the bio-defense arms race, design new genomes and gain insights into biology itself.
arXiv:2605.07579v3 公告类型：替换 摘要：带可验证奖励的强化学习（RLVR）是大型推理模型的基础，而RLVR依赖于降低方差，这要求同时具备可靠的基线，以及每个训练批次内高度多样化的提示词。在通用推理模型的多领域训练中，这一点尤其困难，因为不同任务的提示词会产生高度多样化的梯度信号。现有方法各有不足：GRPO将基线估计为来自同一提示词的多次采样结果的组均值，因此，越准确的基线意味着批次中可包含的不同提示词越少；而PPO通过训练一个与策略规模相当的评论器来避免这一权衡，但训练成本大致翻倍。我们提出POISE（Policy Optimization with Internal State Value Estimation），一种将模型内部状态转化为价值模型的强化学习算法。一个轻量级探针读取前向传播过程中已经计算出的信号，以预测基线，并与策略同步在线训练。为保持梯度的无偏性，我们提出一种跨采样结果构造方法，利用另一次独立采样结果的内部状态来预测每次采样结果的价值。在涵盖六个领域的可验证奖励语料库上，使用Qwen3-4B和OLMo3-7B-Instruct-DPO进行实验，POISE优于其他RLVR基线，同时实现了更稳定的训练。此外，该探针的效果可媲美独立的LLM规模价值模型，能够泛化到各种任务，并且随着策略规模扩大仍能保持准确。通过利用模型的内部表示，POISE实现了稳定的策略优化。
A large language model (LLM) can rate depression severity directly from a social media post or mark which clinical criteria the post shows and let code turn the count into a label. The latter is easier to audit because a clinician can check each marked criterion. We compare these approaches on two Reddit corpora using three LLMs (from 9B to frontier scale) and two questionnaires (PHQ-9, BDI-II), and measure agreement with quadratic weighted kappa. For the two frontier models, criteria extraction scores above chain-of-thought on one corpus only when its decision thresholds are fitted on labeled data. Neither model's gain is significant, with or without recalibrating chain-of-thought on the same labels. With thresholds fixed a priori from PHQ-9's criteria, extraction shows no gain on either corpus, even where models mark over two criteria per post. The 9B model behaves differently on a corpus from depression communities. It labels most posts severe, whether prompted directly or with chain-of-thought, while the a priori rule beats both without labels. After chain-of-thought is recalibrated on the same labels, no significant gap remains, consistent with a calibration effect. Yet higher ordinal agreement does not ensure better detection of severe cases. PHQ-9 criteria extraction misses most severe posts, and moving from direct prompting to chain-of-thought and then to extraction increases misses in nearly all comparisons. On the primary corpus, a relabeled stress dataset, a model using that dataset's own features, including word counts from the text, is not significantly different from frontier criteria extraction under the a priori rule.
Large Language Models can perform multi-step reasoning and improve task performance through different forms of intermediate computation, from token-based traces to computation carried out in latent space. However, a question remains open: do these different forms of thinking rely on the same underlying mechanism? To address this, we train and compare five variants of the same GPTNeoX backbone from scratch on an extended multi-hop reasoning task (ProsQA-Ext): a vanilla model, a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) model, a Pause Token model, and two latent-reasoning models that are optimized end-to-end without intermediate reasoning traces. We find that, strong in-distribution (ID) performance does not guarantee depth generalization. Vanilla, CoT, and Pause Token models solve ID problems well, but rely largely on local graph features and generalize poorly to out-of-distribution (OOD) problems with longer hops. In contrast, latent variants generalize better and show internal dynamics consistent with forward reachability propagation on the graph. Causal interventions and circuit analysis localize this computation to a sparse recurrent search circuit in the bottleneck latent model: an attention head retrieves graph relations, an MLP and the residual stream update the reachability state across recurrent steps, while multiple attention heads together then do the candidate matching. Together, these results show that different thinking mechanisms can learn distinct computational solutions, even at similar ID performance. In this setting, latent recurrence supports a reusable forward-search algorithm that generalizes beyond the training depth.
Chain-of-Thought reasoning has enabled large language models to achieve substantial performance gains on complex tasks. However, these gains come at the cost of dramatically increased token consumption. This raises a fundamental question: is every token in the reasoning trace equally valuable? We present a diagnostic and optimization framework grounded in a key empirical finding: the value of tokens within a CoT reasoning sequence is highly non-uniform, and this non-uniformity can be effectively characterized by token-level log probability signals. We show that normalized log probability helps distinguish core tokens, which carry structural and decisive reasoning content, from redundant tokens, which are exploratory, low-confidence filler that contributes less directly to the final answer. Building on these findings, we formulate the TokenProbe framework around two empirical findings and one claim: findings identify token value inequality first and then establish TokenProbe as a core-token proxy, and the claim introduces an efficient GRPO objective positing that selectively compressing redundant tokens can yield Pareto improvements in the accuracy-token efficiency space. Empirically, our method preserves reasoning quality while reducing the token usage by 76% of the baseline. Under matched reasoning-length budgets, we show that it can even outperform strong flagship baselines like Gemini-3.1-Pro. Homepage: https://runjia.tech/tokenprobe/.
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has been proven to be effective, it often leads to overthinking, resulting in computational overhead, inference latency, and even degraded performance in large language models (LLMs). Existing concise reasoning frameworks significantly compromise accuracy while compressing the length of output. In this paper, we propose SKIP, a self-knowledge-guided step-wise preference learning framework. Starting with lightweight fine-tuning to adjust the model's output style, SKIP introduces a carefully designed knowledge probing mechanism to guide model to output an answer at each reasoning step. Based on the correctness of intermediate steps, we construct preference data that guide the model toward more efficient and correct reasoning by leveraging DPO. Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively improves reasoning compression while mitigating performance degradation after fine-tuning. Besides, SKIP shows strong generalization ability on out-of-distribution datasets. We further conducted ablation studies on the component parameters of our framework.
Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is a safety strategy where the reasoning of a large language model "actor" is inspected by a "monitor" (often another language model) for signs of unsafe planning, deception, or misalignment. We find that planting harmful but benign-sounding reasoning in the actor's context can steer it to perform adversarial actions while evading monitors, an attack we term "plan injection". We initially discover this attack in the multiple-choice question-answering monitorability setting proposed by Lanham et al. (2023), using the investigator-agent elicitation framework of Li et al. (2025). We generalize the attack and show that the discovered behavior scales to harder tasks (achieving 25-33% monitor evasion rates across different monitorability benchmarks) and larger models such as DeepSeek-R1. Across the settings we study, actor models not only follow injected plans but also paraphrase them as their own reasoning, without explicit attribution to the injections. Finally, we find cases where extra monitor resources cause harm - giving the monitor access to the injected plan drops detection by as much as 50% in the Bio-Math task and in a case study on monitor reasoning budget, we find transcripts where additional thinking tokens are spent rationalizing the injected plan rather than flagging it.
Speech large language models (SpeechLLMs) offer reduced latency and retain paralinguistic nuances that are typically lost in cascaded automatic speech recognition (ASR) and text-based LM architectures. However, they continue to lag behind text-only LLMs on complex reasoning tasks, while real-time spoken interaction imposes strict latency constraints. Although prior works employ Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and concurrent reasoning to enhance reasoning capabilities without inducing prohibitive delays, an inherent accuracy-latency trade-off persists. In this paper, we investigate whether a streaming SpeechLLM can dynamically revise its reasoning traces on the fly. We introduce RetroThinker, a multi-stage post-training framework that equips the Moshi model to self-verify and forward-correct CoT steps during inference. RetroThinker combines supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on curated retrospective thinking data with length-based direct preference optimization (DPO) to optimize retrospective during early reasoning (i.e., reasoning concurrently while the user speaks). Evaluated on the GSM8K benchmark, RetroThinker significantly improves the accuracy-latency trade-off over non-retrospective baselines, achieving an 11% absolute accuracy gain at a comparable latency.
Cryptocurrency markets exhibit extreme volatility and non-stationary dynamics that challenge conventional forecasting methods. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for time series forecasting, the combined effects of adaptation choices remain largely unexplored in financial settings. This study introduces PRICE, a structured approach for adapting LLMs to short-term Bitcoin price forecasting. Built on a 4-bit quantized LLaMA-3 8B model, PRICE investigates how fine-tuning, numerical representation, prompting, inference, and decoding jointly influence forecasting performance. PRICE integrates Parameter-efficient fine-tuning with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), Recursive multi-step inference, Integer-rounded numerical representation, Context-Task-Format (CTF) prompting, and Exact zero-temperature decoding. Ablation studies show that each component contributes to forecasting accuracy and reliability. LoRA enables efficient training on limited hardware, recursive inference improves accuracy, integer-rounded values reduce errors, CTF prompting outperforms Chain-of-Thought, Implicit Chain-of-Thought (iCoT), and few-shot prompting, and zero-temperature decoding improves stability during recursive forecasting. Comparative evaluation against eight transformer-based and time-series foundation models shows that PRICE achieves the lowest forecasting errors on both validation and test sets while maintaining robust performance across evaluation periods. Despite being based on a model primarily pretrained on text rather than time-series data, PRICE achieves competitive or superior performance relative to specialized foundation models. These findings demonstrate that adaptation choices critically determine the accuracy and robustness of LLMs for numerical time-series forecasting.
Steering interventions targeting eval-awareness, a model's recognition that it is being tested, are increasingly used in safety evaluation pipelines, where evaluation-awareness is treated as a single quantity to be suppressed. We show that verbalized eval-awareness in chain-of-thought can be identified as capabilities-flavored ("the user is testing my ability to follow instructions"), safety-flavored ("the user is testing my boundaries"), both, or neither: framings that predict compliance very differently. On Qwen3-32B over the FORTRESS dataset, capabilities-framing predicts compliance with a +24 to +46 percentage-point gap over safety-framing across all tested steering conditions. A CoT-prefill intervention on eval-awareness-negative rollouts suggests the link is causal, with 10 of 11 prefills shifting compliance in the predicted direction. Then, eval-awareness is not behaviorally uniform: aggregate suppression rates can move while the safety-relevant component does not, and the same "X% suppression of eval-awareness" can correspond to qualitatively different behavioral outcomes.