![]() | |
In my company they give each one claude code. The transition of winning an argument change to “claude said…” which are fucking annoying facing this shit in daily basis. Code base becoming a blackbox where god and AI know what its like, every function have 4 line of paragraph historically describing changes from past to the future. Im thinking of resigning because i cant bear this shit anymore but seems like its not better in other place. Its time for me to retire and change career IG.
Im sick of this becoming middleman between my manager and the AI |
|
![]() | |
We still have some product development software teams at my company that have not changed at all in the last year. We develop medical products in the U.S., so it is heavily regulated and processes change very slowly. We also require reviews from our legal team, so it takes a while for any new contract or agreement to be approved. This is temporary though; other teams are fully embracing AI in their processes, and it's really only a matter of time until all teams use it. We have C-suite instructions to promote AI adoption. AI will slowly creep into software testing, verification, and eventually the requirements management and software development itself. I'm working on some of the pilot projects. |
|
![]() | |
I’ve learned for myself that I need to write code just to keep my brain in shape - same as going to the gym to be healthy. Even though agents are building all of my code now, I’m starting every morning with a LeetCode problem. There is no practical use, but it make me feel good and sharp for the rest of the day. For anyone coping with AI I suggest to give it a try, and stick to it for some time, just like with a gym. |
|
![]() | |
Smart. I've been thinking about doing the same. I regret not doing this 10 years ago. Just ~20 minutes of leetcode practice for a decade. I could have landed so much better gigs. :-/ |
|
![]() | |
> These days I feel I am the only one that hasn’t changed their way of writing software at all. If you mean using a text editor, a shell, and a makefile, then you're not alone by any stretch of the imagination. If you mean your skills stagnated 10+ years ago and have not advanced since then, then... yeah, you might be the only one ;). |
|
![]() | |
Shovel company, not software directly... but close. I'll use LLMs when these people start using SCM. |
|
![]() | |
>I can close an eye on using LLMs for research only. Yes, this is the only way I use them. As a better search tool for the collective knowledge, and to do arbitrary queries on a complicated code base. If there are any mechanical changes, like renaming something or such, I might use an LLM for it as well. |
|
![]() | |
I do not have an answer to your original question but I do have a comment that I have realized it myself quite recently. May be the analogy is not good enough but here it goes: no one would go back to punch cards etc, we have come a long way. And GenAI is such a tool - there is no going back. |
|
![]() | |
Yea, it is easier to use an LLM for search than using a conventional search engine. No one is going back to that if a non-malicious LLM is available at reasonable costs. |
|
![]() | |
Dow/classified projects can still be pretty old school. Our company hasn’t really done much on the AI front yet although I’m pushing hard to change that. |
|
![]() | |
on the other hand cyberespionage has changed drastically |
|
![]() | |
I am deeply envious that you have dodged the slop trenches and get to walk into a somewhat cleaner solution. The rest of us have to clean up and maintain the slop and it's depressing as hell. |
|
![]() | |
There are some "boring" enterprises that "lag behind" (subjective) the alleged trend. It just needs to have a sceptical independently-thinking CTO I guess. Which kind of goes against the typical people filling such roles. |
|