Hacker News 熱門精选74

GLM-5.3 Artificial Analysis 基准测试

GLM-5.3 Artificial Analysis Benchmarks

· 56天前
跳到正文

精选理由

快速了解GLM-5.3在各项基准中的表现

AI 摘要

文章 URL: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/glm-5-3 评论 URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49353407 点数:32 评论数:7

正文

GLM-5.3 (max) logo
•

Proprietary model

•

Released August 2026

GLM-5.3 (max) Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

Model summary

Intelligence

#8 / 181
60
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
4 out of 4 units for Intelligence.

Speed

N/A
Output tokens per second
Unknown out of 4 units for Speed.

Cost

#53 / 181
In $1.40Out $4.40Cache Discount 81%
$0.68
Cost per Intelligence Index task
3 out of 4 units for Cost.

Verbosity

#72 / 181
170M
Output tokens from Intelligence Index
4 out of 4 units for Verbosity.

Comparison Summary

GLM-5.3 (max) is amongst the leading models in intelligence and reasonably priced when comparing to other models of similar price. The model supports text input, outputs text, and has a 1M tokens context window.

GLM-5.3 (max) scores 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among comparable models (median: 35). When evaluating the Intelligence Index, it generated 170M tokens, which is very verbose in comparison to the median of 72M.

Pricing for GLM-5.3 (max) is $1.40 per 1M input tokens (moderately priced, median: $1.75) and $4.40 per 1M output tokens (moderately priced, median: $10.00). In total, it cost $1238.50 to evaluate GLM-5.3 (max) on the Intelligence Index.

Technical specifications

ReasoningYes

This page shows the reasoning version of this model.

A non-reasoning variant may also exist.

Input modality

Supports: text

Output modality

Supports: text

Context window1M
~1500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font

181 models in this class

Metrics are compared against models of the same class:

  • Non-reasoning models → compared only with other non-reasoning models
  • Reasoning models → compared across both reasoning and non-reasoning
  • Open weights models → compared only with other open weights models of the same size class:
    • Tiny: ≤4B parameters
    • Small: 4B–40B parameters
    • Medium: 40B–150B parameters
    • Large: >150B parameters
  • Proprietary models → compared across proprietary and open weights models of the same price range, using a blended 3:1 input/output price ratio:
    • <$0.15 per 1M tokens
    • $0.15–$1 per 1M tokens
    • >$1 per 1M tokens

Highlights

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Prompt Options

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexUpdatedAgentic IndexUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
29 of 610 models
NEW
Add model from specific provider
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Open Weights / ProprietaryReasoning / Non-ReasoningText Only / Multimodal Inputs

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
29 of 610 models
NEW
Add model from specific provider
ProprietaryOpen Weights (Commercial Use Restricted)Open Weights
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Open Weights

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
CodingTool UseLong ContextMultimodalInstruction FollowingFaithfulnessWritingUser InteractionBusinessFinanceLegalMedicalSee more
19 of 23 evaluations
29 of 610 models
NEW
Add model from specific provider

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Scientific reasoning

Physics reasoning

Knowledge

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCRUpdated

Long context reasoning

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Intelligence Evaluation Relevance

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience IndexAA-Omniscience AccuracyAA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
29 of 481 models
NEW
Add model from specific provider
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Time per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Output SpeedIntelligence Index vs. End-to-End Response Time

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
29 of 610 models
NEW
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Z AIGoogleAnthropicDeepSeekSpaceXAIKimiNVIDIAMetaOpenAIAlibaba
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Token Use

Output Tokens per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Output Tokens per TaskIntelligence Index Token UseIntelligence Index vs. Token Use

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
29 of 610 models
NEW
AnswerReasoning
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

Cost

Cost per TaskIntelligence Index vs. Cost per TaskEvaluation Breakdown

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
29 of 610 models
NEW
AnswerReasoningCache WriteCache HitInput
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Intelligence Index Total CostIntelligence Index vs. Total Cost

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
29 of 610 models
NEW
Add model from specific provider
OutputReasoningCache WriteCache ReadNon-Cache Input
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Cache Hit, Input, and Output PricingBlended PriceBlended Price (Stacked)Cache DiscountIntelligence Index vs. PriceIntelligence Index vs. Price (Log, Inverted)Image Input Pricing

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
29 of 610 models
NEW
Add model from specific provider
Cache HitInputOutput
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Cache Hit

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

4 more notes

Context Window

Context WindowIntelligence Index vs. Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
29 of 610 models
NEW
Add model from specific provider
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Context Window for RAG

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Context Window

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GLM-5.3 (max)

When was GLM-5.3 (max) released?

GLM-5.3 (max) was released on August 18, 2026.

Who created GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) was created by Z AI.

How intelligent is GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) scores 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it well above average among other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 35).

How much does GLM-5.3 (max) cost?

GLM-5.3 (max) costs $1.40 per 1M input tokens (better than average, median: $1.75) and $4.40 per 1M output tokens (better than average, median: $10.00), based on Z AI's API.

What is GLM-5.3 (max) API pricing?

GLM-5.3 (max) costs $1.40 per 1M input tokens and $4.40 per 1M output tokens (based on Z AI's API). For a blended rate (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio), this is $0.90 per 1M tokens. Pricing may vary by provider. Compare provider pricing

How verbose is GLM-5.3 (max)?

When evaluated on the Intelligence Index, GLM-5.3 (max) generated 170M output tokens, which is at the higher end compared to other reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 72M).

Is GLM-5.3 (max) a reasoning model?

Yes, GLM-5.3 (max) is a reasoning model. It uses extended thinking or chain-of-thought reasoning to work through complex problems before providing an answer.

What input modalities does GLM-5.3 (max) support?

GLM-5.3 (max) supports text input.

What output modalities does GLM-5.3 (max) support?

GLM-5.3 (max) supports text output.

Can GLM-5.3 (max) process images?

No, GLM-5.3 (max) does not support image input. It can only process text.

Is GLM-5.3 (max) multimodal?

No, GLM-5.3 (max) is not multimodal. It only supports text input.

What is the context window of GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. This determines how much text and conversation history the model can process in a single request.

Is GLM-5.3 (max) open source?

No, GLM-5.3 (max) is proprietary. The model weights are not publicly available.

How many parameters does GLM-5.3 (max) have?

GLM-5.3 (max) has 753 billion parameters.

How does GLM-5.3 (max) perform on benchmarks?

GLM-5.3 (max) achieves a score of 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This composite benchmark evaluates models across reasoning, knowledge, mathematics, and coding.

Is GLM-5.3 (max) available via API?

Yes, GLM-5.3 (max) is available via API through 1 provider. Compare API providers

Where can I use GLM-5.3 (max)?

GLM-5.3 (max) is available through 1 API provider. Compare providers

查看原文(Hacker News 熱門)