全部动态

本页 40 条
10月9日 周五
The Verge AI61

OpenAI doubles down on decision to fire three AI safety researchers

OpenAI is standing firm on its decision to fire three safety researchers after an investigation found they committed "a significant breach of trust." In a post on X on Friday, the company said Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita ⁠Balesni were dismissed for violating "clear policies on handling sensitive information." It insisted the decision was […]

The Decoder72

Anthropic's Claude Science 首次创建完整的天空紫外线地图

Johns Hopkins University 的天体物理学家 Brice Ménard 使用 Anthropic's Claude Science 首次绘制了整个天空的紫外线图。AI 智能体从多个太空任务中下载数据,对其进行校准,并使用图像修补技术填补空白。预测结果与实际测量值的平均偏差约为百分之十。Ménard 认为,这个项目体现了一类如果没有 AI 就根本无法完成的研究。文章《Anthropic's Claude Science creates the first complete ultraviolet map of the sky》最先发表于 The Decoder。

MIT Technology Review AI59

We’re putting too much faith in AI’s ability to say no

Ever since people first seriously contemplated giving machines an intelligence modeled on our own, there has never been any question that they would, like us, be able to say no. The sci-fi canon is full of stories of robotic disobedience. Most of these capers are, of course, cautionary. But recently, the idea that AI shouldn’t…

MarkTechPost58

Google Cloud Launches Gemini Agent, One Universal Agent for Enterprise Work

Google Cloud has introduced the Google Cloud Gemini agent, a single agent for enterprise work. The Gemini agent is a cloud-hosted agent from Google Cloud that answers questions, does knowledge work, creates media, and writes and runs code. It does all of this from 1 prompt box and 1 API. For developers, the agent is […] The post Google Cloud Launches Gemini Agent, One Universal Agent for Enterprise Work appeared first on MarkTechPost .

The Decoder76

OpenAI揭露了俄罗斯和伊朗在真实新闻媒体中植入虚假报道的影响力行动

OpenAI揭露了一项俄罗斯影响力行动和一项伊朗影响力行动,并封禁了涉事账号。俄罗斯的“Dark Clark”行动在拉丁美洲各地传播虚假信息,引发政界人士回应,并在OpenAI的报告历史中首次获得6级中的5级评级。伊朗的“Bogus Bylines”行动利用7名虚假记者,在全球各地的网络媒体刊登了近100篇文章。文章《OpenAI揭露了俄罗斯和伊朗在真实新闻媒体中植入虚假报道的影响力行动》最初发表于The Decoder。

Hacker News AI60

Can an AI learn what you like, rather than just what you've searched for?

I'm a writer who was pondering the problems with getting my work discovered and realized that current search/recommendation engines don't go very deep. So I thought about ways to address this. I was obviously mostly interested in books, so I worked on that first. I'd noticed LLMs are capable of pretty solid textual anaylsis these days, so I wondered if you could use that to generate good recommendations. So I sat down with an LLM- ChatGPT, Luna, for the curious- and spent about two hours explaining, in datail, my literary tastes- going into specifics like what sort of plot structure, characters, and humor I like, not just genre/specific titles. The experiment demonstrated surprisingly strong results (though admittedly with a very small sample size)- the five recommendations I asked for were all ones that I hadn't heard of, as well as books that I would actually read. Further, I provided the LLM with a list of several books I had read and asked it to guess whether I would have liked them and why. The LLM successfully did so. Just proof of concept, but intriguing. The problem with this, of course, is that most people wouldn't sit down with an LLM for an extended period of time to discuss literature. So I decided to build a small prototype of an app that might be able to do that. The prototype is very simple- first, there are two types of information it saves- a persistent preference profile for the user, and user conversations. Then I built conversational functions to call an LLM to have conversations with the user to extract preference information. The interesting thing to me is that this isn't just using an LLM to make recommendations- it's using one to analyze conversations over time, develop a persistent, evolving preference model for a specific user and then use that model to guide an LLM on a search for recommendations. A few things occurred to me. First, the conversations and user profile DO NOT need to live on a central server- they can be stored locally by the user (or in a cloud of their choice). Second, it seems like the user data could potentially be minimized and pseudonymized before being sent to the LLM, though I lack the technical expertise to know what is realistic here. Third, if the LLM is conducting any searches, this would seem to make it possible to provide search services with less information about the user and their preferences (I'm not positive about this, so please do correct me if I'm wrong). Finally, books are just one of the things you could use this for- it could technically be done for just about anything, at least in theory. I experimented with this process several times, and received encouraging results. What I don't know is- Is this architecture novel? Does it work on things other than books? Am I an outlier in how well I articulate my preferences? Am I wrong about the potential benefits to privacy? Would people use this? If the search results are as qualitatively higher for others as it was for me, I think they probably would, but I just don't know. The reason I'm posting this is because I am a writer, not a software engineer. I don't really have a strong interest in developing this and could bring very little to the table on the technical side. But it seems like a neat use of the more advanced LLMs we have these days. I don't really know if the idea is novel (not in each part- every bit of the pieces has been done before- but as a whole). I'm in the process of documenting the prototype and experiments- I'd be curious to hear if I am completely barking up the wrong tree or if this could actually be a cool new way to conduct searches. I'm not posting this as a business proposition- it's just not my jam. If anyone wants to take the idea and run with it, I'd love to see what you do with it. Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50017172 Points: 1 # Comments: 1

Hacker News 熱門

Show HN: OldRoll, a free vintage photo editor for the browser

OldRoll Web brings vintage camera effects and film-inspired filters to your browser. Give everyday photos a nostalgic look without installing an app, with all creative assets free to use. Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50016840 Points: 3 # Comments: 1

MarkTechPost56

Google Research RRSI Guide: Mastering Self-Improving AI Agents

Explore a comprehensive coding guide to Google Research's RRSI (Regularized Recursive Self-Improvement), detailing how noise bands, cost rules, and leakage screens enable safe, efficient, and self-improving AI agents. The post Google Research RRSI Guide: Mastering Self-Improving AI Agents appeared first on MarkTechPost .

Hacker News AI54

Show HN: Wy – a Rust terminal tool for understanding AI-generated code

I have been an opensource terminal tool for understanding AI-generated code. A git-diff shows what changed, but the context behind it lives somewhere within the agent's session context, and often goes missing in long running agent execution. Wy helps reduce that understanding gap, and helps engineers build judgement. This is especially useful for unfamiliar codebases, where agents are the primary interface for the developers. It is meant to be used alongside the With wy, you can: - Browse changes, and relevant agent notes in a terminal UI - Request explanation and ask follow up questions and changes - Open code references and citations - Distinguish recorded justifications agents derived to get a better understanding of the changes. If you try, and find it useful consider supporting it with a github star or bug report or contribution. Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50016298 Points: 1 # Comments: 0